rejected comments.....

ok, so the mm will admit to rejecting and deleting a few comments....now and again....curiously....such commenters seem especially piqued with my way of denoting pauses.........with periods....(excepting the idiot who berated me for misspelling jane austen....and then misspelled it herself in her comment space.....).....such a plethora of periods must bring out the worst in some who are not used to my style of blogging......the last entry, with it's comment about my editorial idiosyncrasies was evocative.......the bumbling blogger took time to misspell the very word he/she targeted for shame.......and so i feel as though i must take the biblical high-road here......wwjd?.........for starts.......j. would never have misspelled his comments on misspelling.......didn't he say that he/she who is without sin should throw the first stone?........and then there are the pauses.........as a sunday school teacher with at least 18 years of study under her belt.......i can honestly say that the bible implies breaks and pauses by the use of verses........i suppose i could take the biblical high road and start using verse delineations rather than periods......but it would seem so very foolish and.....ralph reed-like.....and heaven sakes i do not want to take that path............i prefer to think that when the blogger-style book is revised.......all of god's bloggers will use periods to show pauses........